Policy Documents and Actions
IHPC maintains this archive of recent policy-related documents, letters, and information materials for reference and for easy access to many of the foundational documents created during the early 2000s when IHPC was created and began the collaborations with other complementary, holistic and integrative health organizations that continue today.
For questions about these and other documents — if you are a provider, policy specialist, reporter, researcher or healthcare organization — please get in touch with us at email@example.com.
IHPC Provides Guidance to CMS on Its RFI on the Future of the Innovation Center and Funding New Medicare and Medicaid Payment Models
The CMS Innovation Center, CMMI, has been funding new models of payment for its Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries in the last several years, through an Alternative Payment Model (APM) program that solicits the applications of clinical enterprises across the country. Regrettably, few have come from the integrative clinical community, which has been historically separated by rules.
IHPC’s guidance to CMS asks that the agency makes sure that existing restrictions on payment for the services of licensed providers be waived in order to give its beneficiaries access to care that is readily available on the market. Click on the headline above for a PDF copy of the letter signed by IHPC Chair Len Wisneski, MD.
PRESS RELEASE: IHPC Strongly Endorses 37 State Attorneys General Encouraging Private Insurers To Cover Non-Opioid Pain Management Treatment
The Attorneys General from 37 states, through their National Association of Attorneys General, NAAG, have co-signed a letter to America’s Health Insurance Plan, AHIP (the trade association for private health insurers), requesting that their members expand reimbursement for healthcare providers so that all licensed non-pharmacologic pain management options are available to treat chronic and other pain conditions.
IHPC’s Press Release (click the title above) affirms the critical importance of this action. It is the latest in a crescendo of demands from the nation’s most important medical professional, standards and regulatory bodies to remove the barriers to full and comprehensive pain treatment. The default option remains the use of other drugs, under the practice of “Medication-assisted Treatment” (MAT), which has yet to prove effectiveness as an alternative approach.
Many are calling the opioid crisis an emergency. Numerous task forces, practice guidelines from both professional organizations and governmental agencies, the Joint Commission and the former Surgeon General’s Turn the Tide Campaign recommend non-pharmacological approaches to pain.
Moving Beyond Medications is a new campaign from the Integrative Health Policy Consortium and its partners that recommends non-pharmacological approaches as first-line pain treatment. It recommends opioids be considered only if these and non-opioid treatments are ineffective.
A new Pocket Guide for Non-Pharmacological Approaches to Pain Management and Well-Being expands on these recommendations to help primary care clinicians and their patients with this approach.
Download the Guide today to share with health professionals and the public.
IHPC Recommends Education Critical for Adoption of Non-pharmacologic Pain Treatments: Response to FDA request for public comment
IHPC has responded to the FDA’s draft for an “Education Blueprint for Health Care Providers Involved in the Management or Support of Patients with Pain“ with specific recommendations for educating practitioners about the non-pharmacologic treatment options that FDA has acknowledged in its plan.
The letter notes that the draft: “Does not substantially provide guidance to practitioners in these areas. We believe that to successfully engage healthcare providers in these significant shifts in their practices, they will require additional direction regarding the application of non-pharmacological approaches.”
IHPC’s core recommendation: FDA should dedicate educational power and authority to teaching practitioners how to begin making the transition to non-pharmacological approaches at the same level that will be done for “non-opioid drug interventions.”
In these comments provided to NIH’s National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) on a draft of it next five-year plan, IHPC reinforces the need for important modifications to the plan as it has been set forth. Among this document’s many important insights and recommendations are these:
- Engaging the practitioners who work with patients in local clinics, in addition to academic researchers,
- Supporting multi-disciplinary teams of investigators, and
- Using more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) methods that can be especially affirming in measuring the real-world impact of integrative health approaches.
The extensive comments offered here provide a useful comparison between the current and growing presence of integrative disciplines in US healthcare and the research agenda proposed by NCCIH for its next five years.
Noting that “The crisis in Flint, Michigan is the tip of the iceberg,” the IHPC in February launched the Flint Michigan Initiative in order to recommend proven integrative approaches into treatment protocols. The task force is co-chaired by IHPC Chair Len Wisneski, MD and Dr. Gail Christopher, Vice President of the Kellogg Foundation, and includes participation by several integrative health organization leaders.
This document is IHPC’s letter entitled “Comments on proposed 2016 Guidelines for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain” to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). IHPC strongly endorses an evaluation of the Guidelines by the American Academy of Pain Management (AAPM). The letter summarizes and lists the powerful collection of pain-related studies and statements produced in the last few years, including the ACCAHC Policy Brief, “Never Only Opioids: The Imperative for Early Integration of Non-Pharmacologic Approaches and Practitioners in the Treatment of Patients with Pain;” and the Joint Commission Revisions to Pain Management Standard, that became effective Jan. 1, of 2015.
IHPC Letter to NCCIH: Make 50% of the Advisory Board Members
Licensed Integrative CAM Practitioners, as Congress Intended
Since the formation of NCCIH forerunner, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), the licensed disciplines in complementary and integrative health have repeatedly demanded that the agency abide by its founding legislation and ensure that at least half the members of its national Advisory Board include CAM-integrative professionals. In this request to restore the original composition, IHPC writes: “The Advisory Council of NCCIH does not reflect the diversity of the integrative and complementary professions… This depleted representation … is restricting research capacity that your mandate intended to instill in their educational institutions.”
A Call to Action on Interactive Health and Medicine Policy,
Advancing the Legacy of U.S. Senator Tom Harkin
This is the final report of the policy symposium held Sept. 29, 2014 at the Georgetown University Conference Center. Leaders in integrative health and medicine presented on the status of and opportunities for the field and hosted a testimonial dinner for Sen. Harkin, to acknowledge his ground breaking initiatives on behalf of integrative health since the early 1990s. His comments are included here, with those of his colleague Sen. Barbara Mikulski who introduced him.
The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH; formerly NCCAM) issued a Request for Information early in 2015 as part of creating a five year strategic plan for 2016-2021. IHPC’s response here enumerates important shortcomings during the previous five years in which the Center did not involve CAM practitioners as directed by its enabling legislation and its own plan for the years 2011-2015.
The FDA held two days of testimony on “Homeopathic Product Regulation: Evaluating the Food and Drug Administration’s Regulatory Framework After a Quarter-Century.” IHPC Executive Director Alyssa Wostrel presented this testimony at the hearing.
This important reference booklet for the first time aggregates the results of many research projects that demonstrate the cost effectiveness of integrative practice for many conditions. It is designed for decision makers who develop care programs, for public policy and regulatory decisions, practitioners at all levels and consumers. Authors: Patricia Herman, ND, PhD; Erica Oberg, ND, MPH; Mimi Guarneri, MD, FACC
In 2013, the Senate Appropriations Committee compelled HHS and other departments to correct an FAQ regarding Section 2706 that distorted the intent of the legislation and has compounded insurer non-compliance with the law. HHS issued a Request for Information in the spring of 2014. IHPC provided this reply (PDF: 14 pages with appendix).
This conference was held in September 2010. The report documents discussions that occurred within the six conference workgroups, and outlines recommendations proposed by each workgroup. It also provides an update of activities that have occurred since the conference (see p.28).
Beginning in April 2008 the Samueli Institute and IHPC’s Federal Policy Committee collaborated on a plan to bring prevention and integrative health to the forefront of America’s healthcare care reform efforts. The result was the Wellness Initiative for the Nation (WIN), which influenced the creation of the National Prevention Council created by the Affordable Care Act in 2010.
The Coalition for Patients’ Rights (CPR) was created in 2006, initially in opposition to attempts to curtail the scope of practice of many healthcare disciplines by the American Medical Association and the Scope of Practice Partnership. IHPC and ACCAHC were both early CPR members.
This 21-page document — the NED Report — reports on an early and historic meeting of health and medicine educators from across the complementary and alternative and conventional medicine continuum. The reports describes the collaborations that led to the meeting. See related appendix next. (PDF)
Prepared by the Academic Consortium for Complementary and Alternative Health Care (ACCAHC) and the Oregon Collaborative for Complementary and Integrative Medicine (OCCIM). The report presents outcomes data from NED’s internet-based survey of all 30 conventional medicine programs that incorporate integrative medicine and 130 federally-recognized CAM programs in chiropractic, naturopathic medicine, acupuncture and Oriental medicine, massage therapy and direct-entry midwifery (This is Appendix 8 of the NED report.) (PDF)
This is the Executive Summary only from a comprehensive study commissioned by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2002 at the request of 16 institutes within the National Institutes of Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The full report, published by IOM as a 337-page volume, “Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States” can be purchased at the IOM website
This very early survey of the presence of integrative medicine in US medical settings was prepared by Clohesy Consulting for the Philanthropic Collaborative for Integrative Medicine which subsequently became the Bravewell Collaborative. (PDF)
Commissioned by President Clinton in March 2000, the White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy took testimony and recommendations from more than 700 organizations and 1,000 individuals, including those who presented in person. This final report includes 29 formal recommendations and 100 action steps. (PDF: 233 pages)
This groundbreaking meeting set a national agenda for integrative healthcare and led to the formation of IHPC. The National Policy Dialogue to Advance Integrated Health Care: Seeking Common Ground was held at Georgetown University Medical School October 31-November 3, 2001. (PDF: 40 pages)